The key distinction: precision vs accuracy
RTK Fix gives you high precision — your positions are repeatable and internally consistent to centimetres. Accuracy — how well those positions match real-world coordinates — depends on the datum, coordinate system and geoid model applied on top. Fix without the right transformation applied can be precise but inaccurate.
Diagnose by offset size
The size and direction of the coordinate error is the fastest clue to the cause. Select the pattern that matches your situation:
0.5 – 2 m
Consistent shift in one direction. Horizontal only — height looks fine.
0.3 – 1 m
Height only — plan position is fine. Ellipsoidal vs orthometric height confusion.
10 m – 100 m+
Large offset, possibly inconsistent. Completely wrong coordinate system selected.
2 cm – 50 cm
Height only and consistent across all points. Wrong antenna height entered.
Cause 1 — Datum mismatch
WGS84 / ETRS89 corrections applied without local datum transformation
Typical offset: 0.5 – 2 m horizontal
All NTRIP correction services — including GEODNET-based services — deliver corrections in WGS84 or ETRS89. These are global reference frames used by satellites. Most countries work in a local national datum — RD New in the Netherlands, OSGB36 in the UK, GDA2020 in Australia — which does not perfectly align with WGS84.
The difference between WGS84 and a national datum is small but significant for precision work: typically 0.5 – 1.5 m in the Netherlands, and similar magnitudes in other countries. If your field software is not applying the correct datum transformation, every point you collect will be shifted by this amount.
- Check your job's coordinate system settings. Verify that both the horizontal datum and transformation method are set correctly for your country.
- For the Netherlands: the job must use RD New (EPSG:28992) with the RDNAPTRANS™ 2018 transformation. Without it, positions will be off by roughly 0.6 – 0.9 m.
- For the UK: use OSGB36 (British National Grid, EPSG:27700) with the OSTN15 transformation and OSGM15 geoid. Without OSTN15, horizontal positions are off by up to 1.5 m and heights by several metres.
- Verify by occupying a known national control point. If the offset is consistent in direction and magnitude across all points, it is a datum transformation problem.
Cause 2 — Missing or wrong geoid model
Ellipsoidal height reported instead of orthometric (above sea level) height
Typical offset: 0.3 – 50+ m in height only
GNSS receivers measure height relative to the WGS84 ellipsoid — a mathematical model of Earth's shape. This ellipsoidal height is not the same as the height above sea level (orthometric height) that appears on maps and is used in engineering.
In the Netherlands, the difference between ellipsoidal height and NAP (Normaal Amsterdams Peil, the Dutch vertical datum) varies between approximately 38 m and 44 m across the country. If your receiver outputs ellipsoidal height and your project uses NAP heights, every elevation you collect will be wrong by this amount.
The correction between ellipsoidal and orthometric height is called the geoid undulation. Applying the correct geoid model converts one to the other.
- Check whether your field software applies a geoid model. In Emlid Flow, go to Job settings → Coordinate system and verify that a geoid file is selected.
- For the Netherlands: use the NLGEO2018 geoid, included in RDNAPTRANS™ 2018. This converts ellipsoidal heights to NAP. Without it, heights are out by 38 – 44 m.
- For the UK: use OSGM15. For Germany use GCG2016, Belgium BG03 and France RAF18. See the country table below for a full reference.
- If the geoid file is not available in your software, download it from the national geodetic authority and import it into the coordinate library.
A 40-metre height error is not RTK failure
A common support question is: “My heights are completely wrong — off by 40 metres.” This is almost never a receiver problem. It is the difference between WGS84 ellipsoidal height and NAP, or another national vertical datum. The RTK Fix is working perfectly — the geoid model has simply not been applied.
Cause 3 — Wrong coordinate system in your job
Job configured with the wrong projection or EPSG code
Typical offset: 10 m to hundreds of metres
If your positions are off by tens or hundreds of metres, or if the offset varies across your site rather than being a consistent shift, the most likely cause is a completely wrong coordinate system. This happens when the job is created with the default coordinate system — often WGS84 geographic or a UTM zone — instead of the project's required system.
- Check the EPSG code of your job's coordinate system and compare it with what your project requires. Netherlands: EPSG:28992 (RD New). Germany: EPSG:25832 (ETRS89 / UTM zone 32N) or state-specific systems. Belgium: EPSG:31370 (Belgian Lambert 72).
- If the wrong system was used for existing data, re-process the raw observations in the correct coordinate system rather than applying a post-collection offset. Projection errors are not uniform across large areas.
- Create a template job with the correct coordinate system and transformation before fieldwork begins. Share it with the whole team so everyone uses the same settings.
Cause 4 — Antenna height error
Incorrect antenna height or measurement reference entered
Typical offset: 2 cm – 50 cm in height, consistent across all points
The antenna height you enter in your field software is subtracted from the measured position to compute the ground point. An error here shifts every height measurement by exactly the same amount. This is a systematic error, which makes it identifiable.
- Verify what the height is measured to. Different manufacturers measure to different reference points. Emlid heights are measured to the bottom of the receiver. Trimble heights are typically measured to the antenna reference point (ARP). Entering the wrong reference adds or subtracts the antenna offset on top of your field measurement.
- Check the vertical offset in the antenna profile. Most field software stores a vertical offset for each receiver model. Verify this value matches the published receiver specifications.
- For tilted pole work: ensure the pole bubble is calibrated. A 2° tilt on a 2-metre pole introduces a 7 cm horizontal error.
- Test on a known benchmark. If the height error equals your measured antenna height exactly, you have entered it in the wrong direction.
Cause 5 — Antenna phase centre offset
Receiver antenna profile missing or incorrect in field software
Typical offset: 2 – 10 cm, height only
GNSS receivers do not measure position at the physical base of the antenna. They measure at the antenna phase centre — a point inside the antenna that varies by satellite elevation angle. Field software corrects for this using antenna calibration data.
If your receiver model is not in the software's antenna database, or the wrong model is selected, the phase centre correction is not applied and height measurements are off by a few centimetres. This is less common than datum and geoid errors but matters for the highest-accuracy applications.
- In your field software, check that the antenna model matches your physical receiver exactly — including variant, such as RS2 versus RS2+.
- For Emlid receivers used with third-party software, download the IGS antenna calibration file in ANTEX format and import it into the antenna database.
- If the offset is consistent and small — 2 to 5 cm in height — it is worth investigating. If it is larger, revisit antenna height entry or the geoid model first.
Correct settings by country
Use this table to verify the coordinate system, datum transformation and geoid model for your working country. All of these must be configured correctly in your field software at the same time.
| Country | Horizontal CRS | Datum transformation | Vertical / geoid |
|---|---|---|---|
| Netherlands | RD New — EPSG:28992 | RDNAPTRANS™ 2018 | NAP via NLGEO2018 |
| United Kingdom | British National Grid — EPSG:27700 | OSTN15 | ODN via OSGM15 |
| Germany | ETRS89 / UTM zone 32N — EPSG:25832 | ETRS89 → DHDN BeTA2007 | DHHN2016 via GCG2016 |
| Belgium | Belgian Lambert 72 — EPSG:31370 | BD72 transformation | TAW via BG03 |
| France | RGF93 v2 / Lambert-93 — EPSG:2154 | Direct ETRS89 alignment | NGF-IGN69 via RAF18 |
| Denmark | ETRS89 / UTM zone 32N — EPSG:25832 | Direct ETRS89 alignment | DVR90 via DK-GM2022 |
| Sweden | SWEREF99 TM — EPSG:3006 | Direct ETRS89 alignment | RH2000 via SWEN17 |
| Australia | GDA2020 / MGA — zone-specific | GDA94 → GDA2020 transformation grid | AHD via AUSGeoid2020 |
| United States | State Plane or UTM (NAD83) | NAD83 (2011) — use epoch-matched | NAVD88 via GEOID18 |
Always verify on a known control point
Before collecting data on any project, occupy a published national control point with known coordinates in the project datum. Compare your measured coordinates against the published values. A discrepancy of more than 3 cm horizontally or 5 cm vertically indicates a datum, geoid or antenna-height problem that must be resolved before fieldwork begins.
Not sure which settings your software is using?
Describe your device, field software and the coordinate error you are seeing to the AI. Include the offset size, direction and whether it affects horizontal position, height or both for a specific diagnosis.



